Flashcards › Test Prep & College › Logic

Logical Fallacies

Common errors in reasoning, each with a plain description and example.

76 cardsGrades 6–8, Grades 9–12, College, Adult#logic#fallacies#critical-thinking

0 of 76 known
76 cards
  • Ad hominemFallacy
    Attacking the person instead of the argumentYou can't trust her plan; she's always late.
  • Straw manFallacy
    Misrepresenting someone's view to make it easier to attack
  • False dilemmaFallacy
    Presenting only two options when more existYou're either with us or against us.
  • Slippery slopeFallacy
    Claiming one step will inevitably lead to extreme results without evidence
  • Appeal to authorityFallacy
    Treating a claim as true only because an authority said it, especially outside their field
  • Appeal to popularityFallacy
    Arguing something is true because many people believe it
  • BandwagonFallacy
    Urging someone to do it because everyone else is
  • Appeal to traditionFallacy
    Arguing something is right because it has always been done
  • Appeal to noveltyFallacy
    Arguing something is better because it is new
  • Appeal to emotionFallacy
    Using feelings in place of evidence
  • Appeal to pityFallacy
    Using sympathy to win agreement
  • Appeal to fearFallacy
    Using scare tactics instead of evidence
  • Appeal to natureFallacy
    Claiming something is good because it is natural
  • Appeal to ignoranceFallacy
    Claiming something is true because it has not been proven false
  • Circular reasoningFallacy
    The conclusion is assumed in the premiseHe is honest because he never lies.
  • Begging the questionFallacy
    Treating the thing to be proved as already true
  • Hasty generalizationFallacy
    Drawing a broad conclusion from too few examples
  • Anecdotal evidenceFallacy
    Using a personal story as proof of a general claim
  • Cherry-pickingFallacy
    Choosing only data that supports your claim
  • Post hoc ergo propter hocFallacy
    Assuming A caused B because B followed A
  • Correlation is not causationFallacy
    Two things changing together does not show one causes the other
  • Red herringFallacy
    Introducing an irrelevant topic to distract
  • Tu quoqueFallacy
    Dismissing a point because the speaker does the same thing
  • Genetic fallacyFallacy
    Judging an idea by its origin instead of its merits
  • Guilt by associationFallacy
    Rejecting an idea because of who supports it
  • Poisoning the wellFallacy
    Discrediting a source before it can speak
  • EquivocationFallacy
    Using a word in two different senses in one argument
  • Composition fallacyFallacy
    Assuming what is true of parts is true of the whole
  • Division fallacyFallacy
    Assuming what is true of the whole is true of each part
  • Burden of proof shiftFallacy
    Demanding others disprove a claim instead of supporting it
  • No true ScotsmanFallacy
    Redefining a group to exclude counterexamples
  • Moving the goalpostsFallacy
    Changing the standard of proof after it has been met
  • Loaded questionFallacy
    A question that contains an unfair assumptionHave you stopped cheating?
  • Middle ground fallacyFallacy
    Assuming the truth must lie halfway between two positions
  • Texas sharpshooterFallacy
    Finding patterns after the fact and ignoring the rest of the data
  • Gambler's fallacyFallacy
    Believing past random events change future odds
  • Sunk cost fallacyFallacy
    Continuing because of what was already invested
  • Special pleadingFallacy
    Excusing your own case from a rule without good reason
  • False causeFallacy
    Claiming a causal link without proof
  • Non sequiturFallacy
    A conclusion that does not follow from the premises
  • Affirming the consequentFallacy
    If P then Q; Q, therefore P (invalid)
  • Denying the antecedentFallacy
    If P then Q; not P, therefore not Q (invalid)
  • Modus ponensFallacy
    If P then Q; P; therefore Q (valid)
  • Modus tollensFallacy
    If P then Q; not Q; therefore not P (valid)
  • SyllogismFallacy
    A deductive argument with two premises and a conclusion
  • Deductive reasoningFallacy
    Moving from general premises to a certain conclusion
  • Inductive reasoningFallacy
    Moving from specific cases to a probable general conclusion
  • Sound argumentFallacy
    A valid argument with true premises
  • Valid argumentFallacy
    A conclusion that follows logically from the premises
  • Weak analogyFallacy
    Comparing things that are not alike in relevant ways
  • Ambiguity fallacyFallacy
    Relying on unclear wording to mislead
  • Fallacy of the single causeFallacy
    Blaming one factor for a complex outcome
  • Appeal to accomplishmentFallacy
    Dismissing a claim because of someone's success or lack of it
  • Argument from incredulityFallacy
    Claiming something is false because it is hard to imagine
  • Naturalistic fallacyFallacy
    Deriving what ought to be from what is
  • Survivorship biasFallacy
    Focusing on successes and overlooking the failures
  • Confirmation biasFallacy
    Favoring information that fits existing beliefs
  • False equivalenceFallacy
    Treating two very different things as equal
  • Appeal to the stoneFallacy
    Dismissing a claim as absurd without showing why
  • Hasty conclusion from small sampleFallacy
    Overgeneralizing from limited cases
  • Ad populumFallacy
    Latin name for appeal to the crowd
  • Ad verecundiamFallacy
    Latin name for appeal to authority
  • Ad ignorantiamFallacy
    Latin name for appeal to ignorance
  • Argumentum ad baculumFallacy
    Appeal to force or threats
  • Reductio ad absurdumFallacy
    Showing a claim is false by following it to an absurd result
  • Ad nauseamFallacy
    Repeating a claim until people accept it
  • Fallacy fallacyFallacy
    Assuming a conclusion is false because the argument for it is flawed
  • Is-ought problemFallacy
    Facts alone do not tell us what we should do
  • Occam's razorFallacy
    Prefer the simpler explanation that fits the facts
  • Hume's guillotineFallacy
    Another name for the is-ought gap
  • Burden of proofFallacy
    The person making a claim must support it
  • FalsifiabilityFallacy
    A claim should be testable and possible to prove wrong
  • Argument from silenceFallacy
    Concluding something from the lack of evidence against it
  • Fallacy of composition exampleFallacy
    Each player is good, so the team must be good
  • Appeal to moneyFallacy
    Assuming something is right because it is expensive or profitable
  • WhataboutismFallacy
    Deflecting criticism by pointing to someone else's faults

Download this deck

Want paper cards? Paste the plain-text download into the flashcard maker.